<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cal Thomas is Good</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.terrarossa.com/index.php/cal-thomas-is-good/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.terrarossa.com/cal-thomas-is-good/</link>
	<description>Where Conservatives Consider a New Energy Future</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 12:01:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dorinda Morrow</title>
		<link>http://www.terrarossa.com/cal-thomas-is-good/#comment-38279</link>
		<dc:creator>Dorinda Morrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2008 00:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.terrarossa.com/?p=239#comment-38279</guid>
		<description>nmv3kjc2khxpx3up</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nmv3kjc2khxpx3up</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Aach</title>
		<link>http://www.terrarossa.com/cal-thomas-is-good/#comment-9438</link>
		<dc:creator>James Aach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 21:54:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.terrarossa.com/?p=239#comment-9438</guid>
		<description>As an energy professional, my biggest concern when electric energy policy is discussed is that few understand how electricity is actually made right now.  (Mr. Thomas article is not really a case in point - he is advocating tackling the problem agressively more than specific solutions.  But we'll see what part II brings.) 

If we don't understand our energy present, how can we hope to pick the best energy future?  I happen to work in the U.S. nuclear industry myself, and I can assure you it is nothing like what either its proponents and critics image.  It has its problems and its benefits - but again, these are not well understood by outsiders - including the press, pundits, politicians and academics. 

To help with the public energy discussion, I've called on my twenty years in the US nuclear industry to write a novel on the topic . - its people, its politics, its technology.  Rad Decision is available at no cost online at http://RadDecision.blogspot.com - and readers seem to like it judging from their comments on the homepage.   It is also now in paperback at online retailers (and I get no royalties from it.) 

Do I think we should embrace nuclear power?  Perhaps, but I think the most important thing right now is to really understand what all our options really are.  I hope "Rad Decision" can add some real world experience to that discussion.

"I'd like to see Rad Decision widely read." - Stewart Brand, founder of "The Whole Earth Catalog", National Book Award winner, and noted futurist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As an energy professional, my biggest concern when electric energy policy is discussed is that few understand how electricity is actually made right now.  (Mr. Thomas article is not really a case in point - he is advocating tackling the problem agressively more than specific solutions.  But we&#8217;ll see what part II brings.) </p>
<p>If we don&#8217;t understand our energy present, how can we hope to pick the best energy future?  I happen to work in the U.S. nuclear industry myself, and I can assure you it is nothing like what either its proponents and critics image.  It has its problems and its benefits - but again, these are not well understood by outsiders - including the press, pundits, politicians and academics. </p>
<p>To help with the public energy discussion, I&#8217;ve called on my twenty years in the US nuclear industry to write a novel on the topic . - its people, its politics, its technology.  Rad Decision is available at no cost online at <a href="http://RadDecision.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://RadDecision.blogspot.com</a> - and readers seem to like it judging from their comments on the homepage.   It is also now in paperback at online retailers (and I get no royalties from it.) </p>
<p>Do I think we should embrace nuclear power?  Perhaps, but I think the most important thing right now is to really understand what all our options really are.  I hope &#8220;Rad Decision&#8221; can add some real world experience to that discussion.</p>
<p>&#8220;I&#8217;d like to see Rad Decision widely read.&#8221; - Stewart Brand, founder of &#8220;The Whole Earth Catalog&#8221;, National Book Award winner, and noted futurist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Grind &#187; Conservatives Coming to a Climate Concensus?</title>
		<link>http://www.terrarossa.com/cal-thomas-is-good/#comment-9436</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Grind &#187; Conservatives Coming to a Climate Concensus?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 20:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.terrarossa.com/?p=239#comment-9436</guid>
		<description>[...] H/T to Terra Rosa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] H/T to Terra Rosa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dyre Portents</title>
		<link>http://www.terrarossa.com/cal-thomas-is-good/#comment-9434</link>
		<dc:creator>Dyre Portents</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 19:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.terrarossa.com/?p=239#comment-9434</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Conservatives Coming to a Climate Consensus?&lt;/strong&gt;

No. But they are realizing that achieving energy independence and fighting climate change both have common solutions...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Conservatives Coming to a Climate Consensus?</strong></p>
<p>No. But they are realizing that achieving energy independence and fighting climate change both have common solutions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
