Terra Rossa | Where Conservatives Consider a New Energy Future
Hands Picture
Kyoto a no-go
by Tucker Eskew
November 17th, 2006

Bill “The Other” Tucker is a learned gent. He’s so right, below, about Gore and nuclear power. So right about cap & trade market mechanisms, so right about the Right and climate change.

But he’s wrong about Kyoto. It’s politically untenable here in the US, and potentially unworkable everywhere else. I see it as history. Worth noting that the best idea in the whole Kyoto plan was inspired by the Americans. The US forced the treaty-writers to include a market system that caps carbon emissions.

Forget about Kyoto. Instead, imagine Americans doing climate action, doing it smart. Not the way crunchy greens would do it, not the way corporate statists would do it–the way America can do it. It’s our nature to fix problems, and no other nation has our track record of innovation, so let’s get going.

I’d like to see the U.S. implement cap and trade to stimulate markets and innovation and reduce our foreign oil habit and cut carbon. We don’t need Kyoto to do all that.

 

Permalink |




This entry was posted on Friday, November 17th, 2006 at 6:24 pm and is filed under Alternative Energy Technology, Cap and Trade, Oil and Gas, Politics/Government . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

One Response to “Kyoto a no-go”

  1. Terry Fife Says:

    Tucker,
    It is nice to see that a conservative call-to-arms may be underway regarding climate change and the global implications involved. Without acknowledgement there can be no solution.
    I think that most reasonable people would agree that we are at a critical point in history - a point where we need to reconsider much of what we have taken for granted. We are destroying our home at an alarming rate, and the energy sources that we have relied upon are now coming at an increasingly heavy price. The objective now should be to reduce environmental damage and work toward a cleaner and more self-reliant future. We probably can’t heal the wounds, but maybe we can stop the bleeding. Corporations can adapt or perish. This should not be a “red state/blue state” issue, but if helps to bring about a greater urgency, so be it. Sometimes, the ends do justify the means.

Leave a Reply

Bottom Border
Top Border
Click here to watch the video.
Top Border
Bottom Border

Top Border
Click here to watch the video.
Top Border
Bottom Border

Top Border
Forward To Friend
Your Email: Your Name: Your Friend's Email: Your Friend's Name: Note to your Friend:
Bottom Border

Top Border

To limit pollution and reduce our dependence on foreign energy sources we should:

Implement a market-based ‘Cap and Trade’ solution
Increase taxes and government subsidies
Buy tickets to see Leo’s latest flop
Do nothing and hope it will get better
Undecided, but we do need to find a solution

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:


Bottom Border