Terra Rossa | Where Conservatives Consider a New Energy Future
Hands Picture
Open Thread - Academy Awards
by Terra Rossa
February 26th, 2007

An Inconvenient Truth won big at the Academy Awards last night. Did it deserve it? Or was it a political statement?

Let’s hear our readers’ thoughts on Hollywood environmentalism… and the show in general.

Permalink |




This entry was posted on Monday, February 26th, 2007 at 1:33 pm and is filed under Climate Change, Hollywood . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Open Thread - Academy Awards”

  1. Levi Strauss Says:

    We seem to forget, these are actors. They aren’t paid for brain power, they’re paid to perform. They have every right to express their opinion, but giving them credence is our fault. Unfortunately, you can get any opinion, scientific or otherwise, you’re willing to pay for. Much of the information “paid for” in the movie is phony. Problem is, if you exaggerate or prevaricate long enough and loud enough, you’ll find people who will believe.

  2. Jim Coleman Says:

    For eight years former VP Al Gore stood at the second most powerful pulpit in the world. During that period little progress was made in the fight against global warming and climate change.

    Mr. Gore has made a movie about the threat of climate change that has grossed nearly $25,000,000. At $8.00 a ticket, that means that over 3,000,000 people got into their fossil fuel burning mini vans, cars or trucks and drove anywhere from 5 to 25 miles to learn about global warming.

    Let’s say that everyone drove on the average 10 miles to get to their local Cineplex. That means” An Inconvenient Truth” produced 17,000 tons of CO2. I will go ahead and assume that everyone also drove back from the theater for a grand total of 34,000 tons of CO2. I know it may be a little lower because I have to assume that Ed Bagley Jr. drove his electric car.

    And now, “An Inconvenient Truth” is an Academy Award-winning film. What does that mean, exactly? It means that thousands, maybe millions of Americans got into their fossil fuel-burning cars to go to their local Cineplex and see this film, so they could be more informed for their Oscar parties. It means that thousands more will make that drive now, to see what all that critical acclaim was about.

    Imagine how much cleaner our earth would be if we were able to turn on our televisions and watch “An Inconvenient Truth on TV instead. Imagine how much cleaner our planet would be if people were this excited about the film winning receiving an Emmy.

Leave a Reply

Bottom Border
Top Border
Click here to watch the video.
Top Border
Bottom Border

Top Border
Click here to watch the video.
Top Border
Bottom Border

Top Border
Forward To Friend
Your Email: Your Name: Your Friend's Email: Your Friend's Name: Note to your Friend:
Bottom Border

Top Border

To limit pollution and reduce our dependence on foreign energy sources we should:

Implement a market-based Cap and Trade solution
Increase taxes and government subsidies
Buy tickets to see Leos latest flop
Do nothing and hope it will get better
Undecided, but we do need to find a solution

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:


Bottom Border