Comments on: South Carolina Presidential Primary Voters’ Attitudes on Carbon Emissions and Climate Change http://www.terrarossa.com/south-carolina-presidential-primary-voters-attitudes-on-carbon-emissions-and-climate-change/ Where Conservatives Consider a New Energy Future Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:37:07 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: teenie http://www.terrarossa.com/south-carolina-presidential-primary-voters-attitudes-on-carbon-emissions-and-climate-change/#comment-45120 teenie Sun, 28 Dec 2008 05:39:17 +0000 http://www.terrarossa.com/?p=89#comment-45120 I was married to this. Is it was thinking theday after tomorrow. Lets <a href="http://jesusraziano.myblog.es" rel="nofollow">teenie porn videos</a> go to. I was married to this. Is it was thinking theday after tomorrow. Lets teenie porn videos go to.

]]> By: orrycgapl http://www.terrarossa.com/south-carolina-presidential-primary-voters-attitudes-on-carbon-emissions-and-climate-change/#comment-44263 orrycgapl Tue, 23 Dec 2008 13:29:27 +0000 http://www.terrarossa.com/?p=89#comment-44263 <a href="http://www.geocities.com/trannysurpris324" rel="nofollow">tranny sex</a> tranny sex

]]> By: jiwinap http://www.terrarossa.com/south-carolina-presidential-primary-voters-attitudes-on-carbon-emissions-and-climate-change/#comment-42019 jiwinap Tue, 09 Dec 2008 19:57:33 +0000 http://www.terrarossa.com/?p=89#comment-42019 <a href="http://members.fotki.com/asiangangbang" rel="nofollow">gangbang cathy</a> gangbang cathy

]]> By: cuzonoqbopir http://www.terrarossa.com/south-carolina-presidential-primary-voters-attitudes-on-carbon-emissions-and-climate-change/#comment-41473 cuzonoqbopir Fri, 05 Dec 2008 17:12:44 +0000 http://www.terrarossa.com/?p=89#comment-41473 <a href="http://www.iblogme.com/sexyhunk" rel="nofollow">hunk fuck</a> hunk fuck

]]> By: cirqyx http://www.terrarossa.com/south-carolina-presidential-primary-voters-attitudes-on-carbon-emissions-and-climate-change/#comment-35164 cirqyx Tue, 14 Oct 2008 09:30:22 +0000 http://www.terrarossa.com/?p=89#comment-35164 <a href="http://www.iblogme.com/erotic" rel="nofollow">erotic girl</a> erotic girl

]]> By: Trevor http://www.terrarossa.com/south-carolina-presidential-primary-voters-attitudes-on-carbon-emissions-and-climate-change/#comment-148 Trevor Sat, 03 Feb 2007 21:21:36 +0000 http://www.terrarossa.com/?p=89#comment-148 Amador: Regarding point 2, I would be interesting in reading more. Could you provide a reference to the relevant data? Amador: Regarding point 2, I would be interesting in reading more. Could you provide a reference to the relevant data?

]]> By: Amador http://www.terrarossa.com/south-carolina-presidential-primary-voters-attitudes-on-carbon-emissions-and-climate-change/#comment-146 Amador Sat, 03 Feb 2007 01:06:03 +0000 http://www.terrarossa.com/?p=89#comment-146 Some questions for the informed; 1. Does CO2 produced in China affect the whole world ? Answer,(yes, and since China does not have to stop polluting, any small filtering in the USA is like peeing in the ocean.) 2. Does the Sun heat the Earth ? Answer, (yes, and NASA says that the surfaces of Mars and the Moon have been on the rise.) 3. Where does the increased heat on Mars come from ? Answer, (the Sun.) In conclusion, I wouldn't base my political future on junk science and the Al Gore scare campaign. Try using your brains for a change. Some questions for the informed;
1. Does CO2 produced in China affect the whole world ?
Answer,(yes, and since China does not have to stop polluting, any small filtering in the USA is like peeing in the ocean.)
2. Does the Sun heat the Earth ?
Answer, (yes, and NASA says that the surfaces of Mars and the Moon have been on the rise.)
3. Where does the increased heat on Mars come from ?
Answer, (the Sun.)
In conclusion, I wouldn’t base my political future on junk science and the Al Gore scare campaign. Try using your brains for a change.

]]> By: Christine http://www.terrarossa.com/south-carolina-presidential-primary-voters-attitudes-on-carbon-emissions-and-climate-change/#comment-145 Christine Fri, 02 Feb 2007 23:05:55 +0000 http://www.terrarossa.com/?p=89#comment-145 I agree. It's easy to support an aggressive strategy if the implications are not discussed. Are people really prepared to pay off the power plants they are using now, but want to close because they produce carbon and pay for new nuclear or gas plants at the same time to replace them? I too would like to see the polling results of would you like to pay double for electricity to address global warming? I agree. It’s easy to support an aggressive strategy if the implications are not discussed. Are people really prepared to pay off the power plants they are using now, but want to close because they produce carbon and pay for new nuclear or gas plants at the same time to replace them?

I too would like to see the polling results of would you like to pay double for electricity to address global warming?

]]> By: Daniel http://www.terrarossa.com/south-carolina-presidential-primary-voters-attitudes-on-carbon-emissions-and-climate-change/#comment-143 Daniel Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:58:49 +0000 http://www.terrarossa.com/?p=89#comment-143 What is a "market-based cap?" Is that kind of like a market-based "five year plan?" It sure sounds like it when we talk about people's "allotments." Where were the questions that ask people what they are willing to sacrifice, such as: Would you be willing to drive 50% less reduce temperatures less than a few tenths of a degree Celsius? [If we jointed Kyoto (and if Europe were complying with the Kyoto Protocol) it would only avert 0.07 of a degree Celsius temperature increase by 2050.] Would you be willing to pay double current prices for gasoline to meet the carbon cap? Would you be willing to only use compact fluorescent lamps in your house instead of incandescent light bulbs. And so on. Who doesn't want to have less carbon dioxide emissions if they are free? Who doesn't want to have carbon dioxide emissions if we can have other people pay for them? How would these results change if people had to actually pay the increased taxes and costs these plans entail. Worse yet, these plans are all cost and no environmental benefit. What is a “market-based cap?” Is that kind of like a market-based “five year plan?” It sure sounds like it when we talk about people’s “allotments.”

Where were the questions that ask people what they are willing to sacrifice, such as:

Would you be willing to drive 50% less reduce temperatures less than a few tenths of a degree Celsius? [If we jointed Kyoto (and if Europe were complying with the Kyoto Protocol) it would only avert 0.07 of a degree Celsius temperature increase by 2050.]

Would you be willing to pay double current prices for gasoline to meet the carbon cap?

Would you be willing to only use compact fluorescent lamps in your house instead of incandescent light bulbs.

And so on.

Who doesn’t want to have less carbon dioxide emissions if they are free? Who doesn’t want to have carbon dioxide emissions if we can have other people pay for them? How would these results change if people had to actually pay the increased taxes and costs these plans entail. Worse yet, these plans are all cost and no environmental benefit.

]]>