Terra Rossa | Where Conservatives Consider a New Energy Future
Hands Picture
Will he or won’t he?
by Terra Rossa
January 17th, 2007

The White House plans to lay out its policy on global warming in the State of the Union address, and everyone is speculating about what that policy will be - some media outlets have been saying that Bush will endorse mandatory carbon caps.

This story says otherwise, but we’ll have to wait and see. Stay tuned for our coverage of next week’s speech!

Permalink |




This entry was posted on Wednesday, January 17th, 2007 at 11:16 am and is filed under Cap and Trade, Climate Change, Politics/Government . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

2 Responses to “Will he or won’t he?”

  1. Chuck Durrenberger Says:

    The concept of ‘global warming’ is a liberal-induced, media perpetuated farce designed to scare and manipulate the uneducated minds of the world. An excellent book, roughly titled “Earth Matters,” clearly explains the geological history, and climatological changes and patterns of temperature fluctuations from geological evidence.

    Unfortunately, simple-minded people are easily deluded into taking various sides of one or more issues without ever having done objective research. The single greatest weapon used against such under-informed people is guilt. Guilt, the power to manipulate others, is rooted in the coercive strategy to condemn another person through their own feelings of inadequacy, weakness, depravity, or other insecurity. As such, guilt is falsely foisted upon the global citizenry that our ‘excesses,’ our habits,’ our ‘needs,’ have been mismanaged, and using the ’sins of the father’ concept, mistakenly mislabeled us as failures…forever beholden to such ignorant mistakes of the past that we are forever failures to decide our future.

    The liberal mindset, those people too ignorant and lazy to accomplish objective research, those too willing to follow some popular icon - false prophets, the Bible has called them, should be placed on trial for Sedition. The 1st Amendment does not offer free-speech protections for ignorance, for causing strive and increasing burdens upon other global citizens. It’s against the law to yell “fire” in a crowded movie theatre. Altruism is an intellectual in spiritual failure.

  2. TMan Says:

    Nuclear power is only answer we have towards energy independence. Wind & solar power, very diffuse & unreliable sources, is just is just peeing into the wind. With nuclear power, we have a robust power source that will be capable of heating homes, running industry and even our cars…electricity for electric cars & even hydrogen (from electrolyis of water)can be derived from nuclear power; while placating the global warming crowd.

Leave a Reply

Bottom Border
Top Border
Click here to watch the video.
Top Border
Bottom Border

Top Border
Click here to watch the video.
Top Border
Bottom Border

Top Border
Forward To Friend
Your Email: Your Name: Your Friend's Email: Your Friend's Name: Note to your Friend:
Bottom Border

Top Border

To limit pollution and reduce our dependence on foreign energy sources we should:

Implement a market-based ‘Cap and Trade’ solution
Increase taxes and government subsidies
Buy tickets to see Leo’s latest flop
Do nothing and hope it will get better
Undecided, but we do need to find a solution

First Name:

Last Name:

Email:


Bottom Border